
While I'm still only playing a little bit, I couldn't really justify not doing much poker-related stuff to myself, so in the interim before I ramp up my schedule again, I've started writing and coaching. Pocketfives asked me to write a computer security article, which came out on Tuesday; in addition, I started to coach a few students that have contacted me earlier.
The most recent reason why my comeback's on hold again is actually legit :), however. In the last few days, Intrade has seen a suspicious trader who has probably made > $100K in McCain bets at well over market prices, artificially depressing Intrade compared to every other political betting site by making very large bets at odd hours. I caught this guy a few days before Nate's entry and have been buying low/selling high off him several times this week. It's now gotten to the point where I'm strongly considering having the site text me at all hours as soon as a certain price point is triggered, because at the amount we're talking about, if he keeps doing it, I can make $500 a day just from being awake at the right time. But this has also forced me to evaluate all of my positions (because I might be able to make more money by buying/selling the Obama contracts than I can with my state picks if I sell them now and buy them back later), and that is time consuming.
The little "prove a point" bet that I made with 2+2 politics about the site in December now looks to be the best idea I had all year, because it's going to provide me with a very large amount of income this year and has sparked my interest in trading in general. Poker is, fundamentally, a relatively simple game. Trading is not, but traders, especially in political betting (and, I assume, sports betting) are subject to the same kinds of psychological issues that poker players are, which makes most of them terrible at important parts of what they do and provides great opportunities.
Because I've been neglecting this blog lately and my positions are largely set anyhow, I'll break my silence and give out a few of my picks. If you want to make a free 20% over a month before the election, you should have all the cash you can spare on Intrade ASAP and bet on:
(People with large bankrolls, look here)
-Obama winning Iowa
Iowa has never seriously been in play. It's a state that McCain mostly skipped in the primaries while Obama spent a year practically living there. In addition, McCain came out against ethanol, a major Iowa issue instantly worth 3-5 points against him, while Obama has supported it. Even when McCain was up 3-4 points nationally, he was substantially down in Iowa; he would have to win the popular vote by something like 8 points to put the state in contention and probably by over 10 points to make it red. With Obama up in the polls 40 days before the election and leading in public perception on the handling of the economy issue, the true odds of a 10 point McCain victory are well under 5%, so Obama trading under 80 to win here is an absolute steal.
-Obama winning Wisconsin and Minnesota
Similarly to Iowa, these states are not actually the swing states they appear. The election will be close in both if McCain is up 3-5 points in the popular vote nationally, but with McCain never winning a single poll in either and with Obama's superior ground game, only a landslide would flip them. They aren't free money like Iowa, but trading in the mid-70's still has them 20 points off where they should be.
-Keep an eye on California
I've seen multiple offers on multiple books to sell massive amounts of Obama.CA shares for 90. Essentially, the guy (I can't believe it was two different people) wanted to bet 10:1 that California would go Republican. I took him up on it on another site, but left his Intrade offer on the table and he quickly pulled it. You never know, though - he might come back.
(Small stakes ballas look below)
-Ralph Nader to win < 1% of the popular vote
Ralph got 0.38% of the vote in 2004. Given how important this election feels to the left and how hated the guy still is for 2000, he'll find it difficult to break that this year and impossibly hard to triple that number. But the contract for him to break 1% is trading at up to 40 (although I'm not sure how high it'll stay, because once I finish typing this I'm going to take the tastiest offers off the board...)
-Various small stakes state deals
Do you think there's a 6% chance that Georgia goes Democratic? I don't. A 15% chance that Oregon goes Republican? No way; both are close to 0%. My bankroll's all tied up in better deals than those, but they're worth it for some of you guys.
There are a lot more I haven't talked about, but if you want to ask, feel free to do so on our forums.