Comment(s)

Back to blog entry | Add blog entry

Comments

Anonymous says

Thanks for this kick in the pants. I've been feeling a lot of Stars cash game fatigue lately, and you've convinced me it's time to move. It's too bad, because Stars is easily the best-run site as far as I can tell.

burningyen

05/21/07

lakeoffire says

Thanks for the sound advice. I totally agree.

05/21/07

EdmondDantes says

I agree with this completely. Huge prize pools make Stars and Tilt tournaments seductive, but the cash game play is much tougher than I find on Bodog and other sites. It's routine to see 40% see flop averages on Bodog vs. <20% on comparable Stars tables. Sure, you can adjust, but why bother if there's softer games out there? Funny you mentioned Everest. I actually liked that site a lot when I could play it. The graphics took some getting used to, but the games were definitely beatable.

As for tournaments, I think the overlays in the Bodog, Pacific and Titan guaranteed tournaments make them no-brainers. It really surprises me how many guys miss the extra value in these tournaments. Let's see...do I play 1) overlay tournaments filled sports book crossovers (Bodog, Cake, Pacific, etc.) who don't use stat-tracking programs or 2) oversold tournaments filled with guys focused on poker, that use tracking software extensively? Hmm.

This game is about making money and a big part of making money is game selection. Nice post!

If you're interested, you can see the overlays in the big weekly tournaments here...

Overlays in Weekly MTTs

Edmond

05/21/07

Post your comment below

Insert BOLD tag Insert ITALIC tag Insert HYPERLINK tag Insert IMAGE tag Insert FONT COLOR tag Insert DIAMONDS tag Insert HEARTS tag Insert CLUBS tag Insert SPADES tag

Chooose an identity


Log in with your TwoRags.com account. Click here to register.


Email:
Password:
Remember log-in information

Where to find the biggest edges

Adanthar Taking a long break always makes me want to play more poker right after getting back. I've been playing a decent amount since Thursday and should have a bunch of fun hands up soon. In the meantime, while I'm picking up material, I thought I'd throw up a quick post on where and how to play to build a bankroll. I'm not Jesus Ferguson and don't make a habit out of making $1 into 20K on a regular basis, but I do occasionally play lower stakes and like to look for spots to boost ROI "off the beaten track". It's not 2004 anymore and making high 4 figures a month from little to no risk casino whoring is a thing of the past, but if I had to make a few thousand dollars into 20,000 as fast as possible, here's what I would do:

1)Immediately move my roll onto as many sites as possible, *but* move it entirely off Stars. I love Stars and have made a lot of money there, but it's just not a good cash game site and the tournaments aren't conducive to a low budget. Even buyins as low as the 11r or the 20/180's get their share of good players, there are no overlays, and satelliting into a tournament only gives you T$ (or W$!!!), so if you're on a tight roll with little margin for error, what's the point?

2)Split the roll up as follows: 50% "cash game site", 50% "tournaments" - split up between Bodog and FTP. The cash game roll can technically be anywhere you have rakeback, but should be on the site with the softest games you can find. I recommend Cake for US players; Euros should look into places like Everest. Other places like UB, Absolute or even WSEX (if you're a limit player) are fine, too, but under no circumstances should your cash game site be Stars or FTP. The combination of bad or nonexistent rakeback + tough games isn't worth it.

3)Why Bodog and FTP for tournaments? Bodog has overlays on every guaranteed tourney they run and soft fields; FT has the best satellites, good SNG's (that aren't as nearly fully solved/12 tabled as Stars) and a good, but still fast-ish structure. Roll permitting, you should also look into some of the smaller sites, still focusing on game selection and overlays.

4)Play weird games. If a site has good NL, it will have great limit and fantastic Omaha. If a site's midlevel SNG's take too long and/or have an odd structure, the top level ones are a goldmine - because pros shun them - and you can probably take shots on a short roll. If you've ever read a book on stud, you already know more than most people playing small stakes HORSE. Those FTP sats where everyone starts with 3 BB? It's probably possible to break 100% ROI in them, because *no one* other than the rare SNG pro has memorized 3 BB ICM theory, much less bubble play when everyone has 5 big bets. Explore, explore, explore.

See you at the tables.